Saturday, August 23, 2008

Eight years ago, Republicans chose George W. Bush over John McCain

Let me get this straight. Eight years ago, John McCain was not good enough. Now Republicans have proclaimed him the most worthy successor to arguably the WORST President this country has ever witnessed. At 64, he was not good enough. Now, at 72, he's miraculously more competent? Wiser? More Presidential? Less volatile? It appears none of the above. Just older.

Without missing a beat, using talking points from the Bush Administration play book, McCain resurrected Cold War language in denouncing Russia's "aggression" in Georgia. He called upon the international community to punish Russian ambitions in the "breakaway republics". (Where was Mr. McCain when so many of us were demonstrating against the then-imminent U.S. aggression in Iraq? Oh, that's right. He was promoting the aggression.) His recent bellicose foreign policy statements on the conflict in Georgia and Iran's insubordination betray an imbalanced and untempered psychology, much like those of our current Commander in Chief and his Sidekick Dick.

War is in McCain's blood. It is part of his identity, reinforced daily, as we are reminded of his sacrifices in Vietnam. (This is such strange behavior. Who among us must daily remind others of our personal struggles 40 years ago?) It concerns me that John McCain is so wrapped in his Prisoner of War persona. Most combat veterans are reluctant to discuss their war experiences. Not John McCain.

To assume that the experience of being a prisoner is in some way a special qualification for the position of Commander in Chief is ludicrous. The office of President is an executive office, not a warrior office. George Washington recognized this. Eisenhower recognized this. (Teddy Roosevelt was less successful at distinguishing the roles.)

"We must succeed in Iraq," McCain continues to insist. And, in his mind, success can only come in the form of military victory. Despite his Vietnam experience, John McCain has failed to learn that illegal acts of aggression and war do not lead to "military victory".

And while the Bush Administration and Iraqi leaders negotiate a "timetable for withdrawal" from Iraq (which they carefully avoid labeling as such), John McCain steadfastly refuses to acknowledge that a plan very similar to one proposed by Barack Obama is the likely outcome of such negotiations.

John McCain is stuck. Stuck in an old paradigm. That of his father, and his grandfather, and the glorious warrior days of World War II. It's the same time warp that envelops George W. Bush, who, like me, no doubt saw too many war movies in his youth.

Thanks in large part to the reign of "warrior wannabes" like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Rice, Libby, Wolfowitz, etc., the World is now a far more dangerous place.

The country, indeed the World, is in need of a new paradigm, and leaders distinguished by their wisdom, sound judgment, honesty, tolerance and by their desire for peace, not war.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

McCain: "We are all Georgians" (If the Price is Right)

Randy Scheunemann, John McCain's chief foreign policy adviser, and one of the most hawkish neoconservatives to sign on to "The Project for the New American Century", has until April been a major lobbyist for the Georgian government. In light of this, McCain's rhetoric in defense of Georgian actions in South Ossetia and his outrage at the Russian response is disingenuous.

This is just one indication that allegiance in a McCain Presidency will be open for bid.

Read more

McCain Adviser Got Money from Georgia

By PETE YOST, Associated Press

John McCain's chief foreign policy adviser and his business partner lobbied the senator or his staff on 49 occasions in a 3 1/2-year span while being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by the government of the former Soviet republic of Georgia.

The payments raise ethical questions about the intersection of Randy Scheunemann's personal financial interests and his advice to the Republican presidential candidate who is seizing on Russian aggression in Georgia as a campaign issue.

McCain warned Russian leaders Tuesday that their assault in Georgia risks "the benefits they enjoy from being part of the civilized world."

On April 17, a month and a half after Scheunemann stopped working for Georgia, his partner signed a $200,000 agreement with the Georgian government. The deal added to an arrangement that brought in more than $800,000 to the two-man firm from 2004 to mid-2007. For the duration of the campaign, Scheunemann is taking a leave of absence from the firm.

"Scheunemann's work as a lobbyist poses valid questions about McCain's judgment in choosing someone who — and whose firm — are paid to promote the interests of other nations," said New York University law professor Stephen Gillers. "So one must ask whether McCain is getting disinterested advice, at least when the issues concern those nations."

"If McCain wants advice from someone whose private interests as a once and future lobbyist may affect the objectivity of the advice, that's his choice to make."

McCain has been to Georgia three times since 1997 and "this is an issue that he has been involved with for well over a decade," said McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers.

McCain's strong condemnation in recent days of Russia's military action against Georgia as "totally, absolutely unacceptable" reflects long-standing ties between McCain and hardline conservatives such as Scheunemann, an aide in the 1990s to then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.

Scheunemann, who also was a foreign policy adviser in McCain's 2000 presidential campaign, has for years traveled the same road as McCain in pushing for regime change in Iraq and promoting NATO membership for Georgia and other former Soviet republics.

While their politics coincide, Russia's invasion of Georgia casts a spotlight on Scheunemann's business interests and McCain's conduct as a senator.

Scheunemann's firm lobbied McCain's office on four bills and resolutions regarding Georgia, with McCain as a co-sponsor or supporter of all of them.

In addition to the 49 contacts with McCain or his staff regarding Georgia, Scheunemann's firm has lobbied the senator or his aides on at least 47 occasions since 2001 on behalf of the governments of Taiwan and Macedonia, which each paid Scheunemann and his partner Mike Mitchell over half a million dollars; Romania, which paid over $400,000; and Latvia, which paid nearly $250,000. Federal law requires Scheunemann to publicly disclose to the Justice Department all his lobbying contacts as an agent of a foreign government.

After contacts with McCain's staff, the senator introduced a resolution saluting the people of Georgia on the first anniversary of the Rose Revolution that brought Mikhail Saakashvili to power.

Four months ago, on the same day that Scheunemann's partner signed the latest $200,000 agreement with Georgia, McCain spoke with Saakashvili by phone. The senator then issued a strong statement saying that "we must not allow Russia to believe it has a free hand to engage in policies that undermine Georgian sovereignty."

Rogers, the McCain campaign spokesman, said the call took place at the request of the embassy of Georgia. And McCain campaign spokeswoman Nicolle Wallace added that the senator has full confidence in Scheunemann. "We're proud of anyone who has worked on the side of angels in fledgling democracies," she said in an interview.

McCain called Saakashvili again on Tuesday. "I told him that I know I speak for every American when I said to him, today, we are all Georgians," McCain told a cheering crowd in York, Pa. McCain's Democratic rival, Barack Obama, had spoken with Saakashvili the day before.

In 2005 and 2006, McCain signed onto a resolution expressing support for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgia; introduced a resolution expressing support for a peace plan for Georgia's breakaway province of Ossetia; and co-sponsored a measure supporting admission of four nations including Georgia into NATO.

On Tuesday, McCain told Fox News that "as you know, through the NATO membership, ... if a member nation is attacked, it is viewed as an attack on all."

Scheunemann's lobbying firm is one of three that he has operated since 1999, with clients including BP Amoco, defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp. and the National Rifle Association.

Scheunemann is part of the community of neoconservatives who relentlessly pushed for war in Iraq.

No one in Washington is more closely aligned with the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq than prominent neoconservatives, who for years had regime change in Iraq as a goal as part of their philosophy that the United States shouldn't be reluctant to use its power, both diplomatic and military, to spread democracy and to guarantee world order.

Now, McCain and other politicians who pushed for the invasion are seeking to emphasize the progress, albeit fragile, of the current troop surge in Iraq.

In the months before the war began, Scheuenemann ran the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, set up in November 2002 when public support for the looming invasion was eroding.

Before that, Scheunemann was on board with the Project for the New American Century, whose letter to Bush nine days after the Sept. 11 attacks pointed to Iraq as a possible link to the terrorists.

The letter said American forces must be prepared to support "by all means necessary" the U.S. government's commitment to opponents of Saddam Hussein.

Scheunemann was among the letter's 37 signers, a Who's Who of neoconservative luminaries including William Kristol and Richard Perle.

If anything, Scheunemann's duties have been enhanced from McCain's 2000 presidential campaign, when Scheunemann also advised McCain on national security and foreign policy issues.

Earlier in his political career, McCain displayed the kind of caution that could be expected from someone who fought in Vietnam and was a prisoner of war.

In 1983, McCain urged U.S. withdrawal from Lebanon. "I do not see any obtainable objectives in Lebanon, and the longer we stay there, the harder it will be to leave," he said.

As the United States prepared for the first Gulf war, McCain was among a handful of members in Congress who began raising caution flags about the operation.

"If you get involved in a major ground war in the Saudi desert, I think support will erode significantly," said McCain. "Nor should it be supported. We cannot even contemplate, in my view, trading American blood for Iraqi blood."

Sunday, August 03, 2008

Mechanical History of a 2005 BMW R1200GS: Review of the First 100k Miles

Over and above normal maintenance and service items, and apart from any damage caused by accidents, I've had to replace the components listed below. (I include brake components, since this machine seems to eat them up. As I write this, my front brake discs and rear brake pads are again in need of replacement.)

The list is surprising, considering I'm a fairly conservative rider, have rarely taken the bike over 90 mph, avoid hard braking and unlike Charley Boorman on all his GS adventures, I've never done wheelies on my BMW. I intend to hold on to it a long time (if I can afford it!)

New, the bike cost $18,610, including panniers and top box. The "extraordinary" costs below, if paid out-of-pocket (a number of them were covered by warranty), would run another $15,000 - 80% of the cost of the new bike. (Parts, labor and tax rates vary widely, however based upon my first-hand experience, this is a fairly reasonable estimate.)

I think it's time for another "conversation" with BMW of North America. What I would like to ask them: "is this considered normal 'wear and tear'?" If so, you might want to budget a bit higher when considering the purchase of a new BMW R1200GS (and check if the new "extended warranties" cover the following items.)

Brake disc, front (6)
Brake disc, rear (2)
Brake pads, front (3 sets, 12 pads)
Brake pads, rear (6 sets, 12 pads)
Charcoal canister
Clutch assembly (2)
Clutch hydraulic line (control cable)
Drive shaft
Drive shaft boots
Fuel pump regulator (fuel pump electronics)(2)
Fuel gauge (replaced fuel pump assembly)
Seal, clutch input shaft
Seal, rear axle, inner
Seal, rear axle, outer (2)
Seal, speedometer pick-up
Seal, transmission, rear
Speedometer (replaced instrument cluster)
Splash guard rear(2)(Did not replace after 2nd one broke)
Spring strut, front
Spring strut, rear
Top box (inadequate fastening system)
Transmission (currently leaking oil)

More on this at 2005 BMW R1200GS Service History Blog